Appetizer:
As fun as it is to talk about books that I liked as a child, I think talking through the books that I didn’t like is useful as well. Of course, there’s definite accounting for taste, but there are some books that just don’t fit into the conception of cultivating a moral imagination. Often, these books are moral in nature. In fact, many of them are not fun to read precisely because they are very direct in their morality. It can be easy to think that a book is good because it has very forthright, good lessons. I think there is perhaps a place for that, but, as you may have guessed by now, there are much more exciting ways to learn morality than through a straightforward story. Today, I’m devoting my time to listing a few of those books that didn’t capture my imagination and in fact, sometimes, made me want to almost act worse because their straight-laced characters had absolutely no fun.
The Main Course: The List
I know that many of you may have loved these books. That’s ok. I did not and perhaps your children will not either. I’ve endeavored to give the reasons why I feel like these books aren’t a great fit for that imaginative nature, but a few of my more biased opinions may seep in.
- Pollyanna by Eleanor Porter. What list of books about good-two-shoes would be complete without Pollyanna. To be fair, Pollyanna is probably a well-written book. I don’t remember having an objection to the prose. But Pollyanna is such a shiny example of how a child would behave that it becomes impossible for the reader to imitate her. To an adult, her undying optimism might seem naive. To a kid, it’s just not real. If I skin my knee, sometimes it feels better to howl a bit. If my sibling annoys me, despite my better judgement, I will probably snap at them rather than being patient. Pollyanna goes wrong precisely because she’s too right. She’s not relatable. Though the character “struggles” to remain cheerful using her “Glad Game”, her very goodness is the reason her struggle annoys the reader. She always does the right thing, so there’s not really room to learn and grow from her mistakes. Part of the cultivation of a moral imagination is learning to identify bad behavior in a good person and hoping for that person to correct it or grow from their mistakes. Not only is that more relatable, but it’s a better teacher because it shows the way out of the mistakes we make and, if the book treats the subject correctly, can be a very powerful moral guide. Now, I will say that Pollyanna is considered a classic of children’s literature and has powerful social influence (optimism is colloquially referred to as being “Pollyanna-ish” sometimes). I don’t have quibbles with the prose used to write the book. I just never found it engrossing or exciting.
- The Elsie Dinsmore Series by Martha Findley. The Elsie books were ones I loved to hate as a child. Similar to Pollyanna, Elsie is a moral girl faced with trying circumstances. While Pollyanna is an orphan, Elsie must endure scorn from her distant father for her strong Christian beliefs. Throughout the course of the story, Elsie breaks through her father’s hard exterior and even brings him to Christianity. The reason I don’t like this book is not because of the moral message. I think there could be great books that teach the moral imagination about such a subject and I’m sure that many found the tale admirable. But, much like Pollyanna, Elsie does not really show backbone. In fact, even when she’s standing up for beliefs, she faints, hits her head, and faces death’s door. This is all because she refuses to play the piano on a Sunday as she believes it to be morally wrong. I know this is a tangent, but there really seemed to be better ways out of the problem than sitting at the keyboard all day refusing to play. She could have played hymns instead of secular songs, for heavens sake! Most of famous classical music was composed for sacred settings! But I digress. Elsie’s adventures continue as she patiently bares up to trial after trial and is eventually vindicated by her tormentors relenting and becoming her allies. As admirable as this story is, it’s just not actionable. Seven year olds typically are not that patient. I don’t think I’m that patient now. I have to say that Elise, rather than inspiring me to do good, really just made me spend hours exclaiming over how pointless the piano fiasco was. I sometimes still bring it up to this day (and don’t even get me started on who she marries later in the series…). Many people have fond memories of this series and I don’t want to take that away from them. However, if you’re trying to teach an impatient opinionated child a lesson in patience, I would try another tack.
- Aesop’s Fables. Much like above, the morals of these stories are extremely clear. These stories do have a lot of literary value, but they are tough to read and appreciate. I would recommend holding off on the whole bundle and maybe introducing one or two of the more famous ones (the Tortoise and the Hare perhaps or the Fox and the Grapes) in the form of a well-narrated book on tape. These narratives can give the color that kids need and reduce the monotony of story after story. Again, these tales have a great deal of wisdom and literary value, but should be used sparingly especially among young children.
Pairs Well with:
It would only be fair if I close this post with a few books that I did like that teach similar lessons to the above. They aren’t a direct correlation, but here’s a quick list of suggestions. I won’t get into why here (because there’s much fodder for discussion on each of them), but here they are!
To Teach Optimism: Calico Captive by Elizabeth George Spear
To Learn Patience: To be honest, I never really learned patience. But if I were to suggest a series about it, the amazing Chronicles of Narnia will cover that story and many more.
To Introduce Stories with Morals: The Princess and the Goblin by George MacDonald